Detection mechanisms

Modern security platforms layer four families of Detection Logic The rule, model, or heuristic that decides whether a given input fires an alert. The logic that produced the alert matters as much as the alert it produced; two engines can name the same alert for very different reasons. on top of each other. Each family is good at something specific and blind to something else. Used together they cover far more ground than any one of them could on its own. When an alert arrives, the first question an analyst asks is which family fired, because that single fact reshapes the rest of the investigation.

The four families at a glance


Trust calibration

Each family produces signals with a different default confidence level. Knowing the family is how the analyst calibrates trust before the investigation begins.

Signature
High confidence, narrow scope. When it fires, it is almost always real, but the family only sees what it has been told to look for.
Anomaly
Low default confidence, wide scope. The signal is genuine but the meaning is ambiguous. Anomaly alerts almost always need correlation with another data source before action.
Rule
Confidence depends on how the rule was written, how recently it was reviewed, and how well it matches current adversary technique. A well-tuned rule is reliable. A stale rule is noise.
Behavioral
Medium to high confidence when the sequence is clear, but the analyst needs to look at the full timeline that produced the alert, not just the alert itself.

Next up

Signature-based (reference)

The oldest and most precise of the four families: deterministic pattern matching against curated indicators of compromise. Read on-demand when a signature alert fires, or skim now if signatures dominate your alert volume.

Browse signature-based